Promotions: (visits to bookshops and educational
suppliers, booksellers)
STRENGTH: instant
access to resource, immediate purchase, review format instantly
WEAKNESS: limitations of books due to their suppliers,
more interest in promoting stock
Reviews: (teachers, TL educational consults,
student)
STRENGTH: if
from an authority very reliable evaluations and relevant resources, large
variety and variety of formats
WEAKNESS: subscription may be required
Bibliographic services: (online public access catalogues,
subject listings)
STRENGTH: specific
resources identified that are relevant
WEAKNESS: dated from the moment they are created,
unavailable, questionable authority
Recommendations
from colleagues and users: (visits
to bookshops and educational suppliers, booksellers)
STRENGTH: online
discussion with other professional and more experienced people
WEAKNESS: recommendations could be bias,
advertisement little knowledge of schools specific needs.
Other criteria
Firstly, the criteria must include authority. Secondly,
relevance. Thirdly, appropriateness for school needs and lastly a review
process by other members of the school.
There will be a need to be flexibly with the type of aid
used. An example may include identifying the credentials of a review
editor/writer when using review as an aid.
Selection aids od particular relevance
National bibliographic databases, subject list, review by an
authority SCAN and recommendations by OZTL_NET are selection aids I believe would
not only benefit my school I’m currently employed but others schools as well.
This selection is based on well-known authorities providing recommendations from
different categories of selection aids which provide variety of information for
the TL to have better judgment when considering a resource.
No comments:
Post a Comment