‘Leadership for Learning’ is a complex and dynamic theme
that supports the numerous forms of leadership styles that exist. It focuses on
practice, connects all levels of leadership allowing followers to shape the
leadership practice (MacBeath & Dempster, 2009, p. 44). L for L creates
connections to numerous people from varying positions within a school and its
community (social capital), prompts monitoring, regulation and evaluation of
how we learn (Agency) and driven through the behaviours, actions and the
conditions we create for students, teachers and parents, stimulating continuous
improvement (Moral purpose) (MacBeath & Dempster, 2009, pp. 46-47).
Instructional Leadership is the most popular form of
leadership in educational settings. Smith & Andrews identify four dimension
of IL; Resource provider, instructional resource, communicator and visible
presence (Marzano, Waters & McNulty, 2005, p. 18). This type of leadership
to me encompasses a teachers role in an education setting.
From my own experiences I believe that as a teacher I use a
range of Piaget, Vygotsky, Skinner and Bruner theories. Rewarding students
(Skinner), nurturing environment allow for social interaction (Vygotsky),
student centred activities targeting student prior knowledge (Piagets) and
considering cultural aspects and learning outside of school (Bruners) (Moore,
2012, pp. 5-23).
The theories that support instructional learning include
Behavioural Learning Theory, Constructivist Learning Theory and a new digital
theory, Connectivist Theory. Behavioural Theory is predominately teacher
directed, Constructivist theory is based on learners creating their own
knowledge from interactions and experiences and Connectivist Theory is
comprised of collaboration and connections in the knowledge building process
and the way information is displayed (Starkey, 2012, pp.23-27). These theories
mentioned can incorporate technology, are outcome based and allow for teacher
centred and student centred activities to occur. Furthermore these theories
allow for collaboration and reflection, supporting instructional leadership in
the 21st Century.
Reference:
MacBeath, J. E., & Dempster, N. (2009). Leadership for
learning. Connecting leadership and learning: principles for
practice (pp. 32-52). London: Routledge.
Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005).
Some theories and theorists on leadership. School leadership that works:
from research to results (pp. 13-27). Alexandria, Va.: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved January 27, 2014 from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.csu.edu.au/lib/csuau/docDetail.action?docID=10089219
Moore, A. (2012). Theories of teaching and learning. Teaching and learning: pedagogy, curriculum and culture
(2nd ed., pp. 1-30). London: Routledge.
Starkey, L. (2012). Knowledge and connectivism. Teaching and learning in the digital age
(pp. 20-28). New York, NY: Routledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment